The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same period.
The table shows the number of people who visited to Ashdown Museum in the year before the redecoration and in the year after this. The pie charts provide data on results of surveys which provide information about people how much satisfied before and after the redecoration.
Overall, it can be seen that the number of people who visited to Ashdown Museum rose significantly and the rate of satisfaction showed a similar trend. It increased enormously.
Looking at the table in more detail, it is clear that Ashton Museum visitors was 74,000 people before the year of redecoration. By the year after the redecoration, this figure had increased to 92,000 people.
Turning to the pie charts, it is evident that the rate of satisfaction increased after the redecoration. The percentage of people who are dissatisfied plunged from 40% in the year before redecoration to 15% in the year after redecoration.The percentage of satisfied visitors and very satisfied visitors showed a similar trend. The former increased from 30% to 40% and the latter rose from 15% to 35%. 10% of visitors replied to survey as very dissatisfied in the year before the redecoration but this figure declined to 5%. The percentage of visitors who didn't join the survey remained unchanged between the year before redecoration and the year after redecoration, 5%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...n to 15% in the year after redecoration.The percentage of satisfied visitors and ve...
^^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...isfied visitors showed a similar trend. The former increased from 30% to 40% and th...
^^^
Line 4, column 555, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...d to 5%. The percentage of visitors who didnt join the survey remained unchanged betw...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09589041096 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98089242463 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424657534247 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4164100314 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.454545455 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.18181818182 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360802275095 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147438834004 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110412779984 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230354734229 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821772980326 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.