The table below shows the results of a survey of average number of cars per hour using three suburbans roads during working hours in a ten-year pollution monitering programme. Traffic calming* was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999.
The given tabular chart illustrates the information about number of cars per hour using by three suburban roads: Harper Lane, Great York Way and Long Lane in ten year pollution monitering programme. At the beginning of 1999, the method of slowing down traffic was introduced.
It can be seen that, in 1993, the number of cars using per hour by harpa lane was 82. Moreover, it was fastly increased during 1994 to 1998 and number of cars were 915. Afterthat, traffic claiming were introduced in the beginning and in 1999 the number of cars per hour had been 204. Furthermore, number of cars in 2000, 2001 and 2002 were 173: 178: 193 in Harper Lane respectively.
As far as trend is concerned, in Great York Way and Long Lane roads, number of cars per hour were 600 nd 400 in 1993. Apart from that, number of cars were increased in both the roads and cars were 667 and 800 till 1996. Moreover, in 1997, number of cars were decreased in both the road to 630 and 638. At the last, number of cars on both the roads were increased to both the roads and cars were 900 nd 1400 at the end year of 2002 respectively.
Overall, it is evident that number of cars per hours were increased during the year 1993 to 2002.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'programme' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'programmes'.
Suggestion: programmes
...g Lane in ten year pollution monitering programme. At the beginning of 1999, the method o...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42857142857 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30099177264 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473214285714 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.844808677 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1818181818 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394772737728 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18059860865 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828054178823 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29013724696 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101216650443 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.53 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.