The given table compares the proportion of water used for different sectors in six countries in 2003.
Overall it can be seen that water was mainly used for the agricultural sector. Another interesting point is that despite being the country with the greatest proportion of water for agriculture, China dedicated the least water for homes.
Looking at the details, agriculture was the dominant sector in China with water usage at 87%, followed by that of Turkey at 73%. The figures for the industrial sector and homes in China were negligible at around 6% while those in Turkey were slightly higher at 11% and 16% accordingly.
Regarding industrial usage of Canada’s water, it ranked first at 81%, after which is that of the UK at 73%. While the figure for domestic in the UK was five times higher than that for agriculture at 4%, the data for the corresponding sectors in Russia balanced at nearly 20%. Australia was the only nation which used water mainly for homes with the proportion at 65%, whereas the figure for industry was next to none, which was the lowest one in comparison with that of the remaining countries.
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks why and what can be done to reduce sugary drinks consumption 89
- Men and women employed in full time jobs should share theresponsibilities of household chores Do you agree or disagree Share relevant personal experiences 89
- Pie chart 78
- The table below shows the water usage for different purposes in six different countries in 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strengths are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly for homes with the proportion at 65%, whereas the figure for industry was next...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, look, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89637305699 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57658344503 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8059131583 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164754245668 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960725335063 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717841347449 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139357859577 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830982643986 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.