The given table illustrates the percentage of the consumption of mobile phones, which were produced by some brands of some market entire the world between 2005 and 2006.
Overall, it is immediately clear that the king of choice in 2005 was the phones of Nokia, increasing a little bit, therefore, it continued to keep the best seller in 2006 while the phones of BenQ Mobile were the least popular in two years.
In 2005, the proportion of phones, which were made by Nokia, was just over 32% and accounted for one-third the total sales. Beside that, these phones were enjoyed in 2006( 35%). The second rank belonged to the phones of Motorola, standing at nearly 18% and the rate of this company went up slightly about 21%. A company, which experienced a similar upward trend, was Sony Ericsson over a years. 6,7% and 7,4% respectively was the level of the sales of this company.
In contrast, the remainders witnessed downward trends( Samsung, L.G, and others). The product of Samsung occupied just under 12% in 2005 and then a year, it decreased by 1%. Furthermore, the smallest sales in 2005( about 5%), which created by BenQ Mobile, still could not improve in selling and went down approximately a half over a year( nearly 2.5%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...5 was the phones of Nokia, increasing a little bit, therefore, it continued to keep the be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a year' or simply 'years'?
Suggestion: a year; years
...ar upward trend, was Sony Ericsson over a years. 6,7% and 7,4% respectively was the lev...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
...rs witnessed downward trends Samsung, L.G, and others. The product of Samsung occ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, second, so, still, then, therefore, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.779342723 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48728832008 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600938967136 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.384925747 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208147358854 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679599813414 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626003063604 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124861956538 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501151507634 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.