The table highlights data on the number of travellers using three major british airports between 1998 and 2003
The table illustrates data about the number of people travelling through the British airports, Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted, over a period of six-years between 1998 and 2003.
Overall, what stands out from the data is that the Gatwick airport and the Stansted showed only upward trends in the passenger traffic, whereas the Heathrow saw both increasing and decreasing trends in the given period. Another interesting point is that the Gatwik airport served more visitors at the start and at the end of the period.
Looking at the detail, as regards to the Heathrow airport, the number of visitors in 1998 was 27.2 million, and then the traffic increased gradually reaching 48.2 million by the end of 2000, which is highest in the year 2000 among all the airports mentioned. Following this, over the next two years, the airport recorded a significant decline in the visitors reaching 33.2 million in 2002. Finally, it increased rapidly to reach 45.6 million at the end. If we look at the Stansted airport the trend was similar to the Heathrow until 2001 where it was used by 47.3 million people. At this point, despite having a growth of over 25 million in the starting four years, it remained unchanged at 47.3 million for two years till the end.
By contrast, the Gatwick airport recorded 36.5 million passengers in 1998 and attracted more visitors gradually till 2002, but this was followed by a rapid growth of passenger traffic in 2003 from 51.1 million to 69.3 millionn in one year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...pidly to reach 45.6 million at the end. If we look at the Stansted airport the tre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, then, whereas, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94466403162 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43488527067 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541501976285 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5354706753 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1111111111 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175339027754 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803967277643 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096141838143 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139810905484 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113384804566 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.