The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where releva

Essay topics:

The table shows data about underground railway system in six major cities with date opened, kilometres of route and passenger number per year in millions.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the number of kilometers of undergrounds routes and passengers every year in particular cities in the world.

Overall, London and Paris have the oldest underground train system in the world. Besides, passengers for Tokyo are the highest, in contrast to Kyoto, which has the lowest number of yearly passengers and the shortest route.

The Metro system in London was opened in 1863 and has the greatest number of kilometers of route, at 394 kilometers, almost doubling the figure for Paris. However, more passengers go by metros in Paris than in London, with 775 million and 1191 million respectively. Tokyo is the busiest of the three with 1928 million passengers yearly and 155 kilometers of route. The proportions of kilometers and passengers in Washington DC, whose underground system was opened in 1976, are 126 and 144 million each.

By contrast, undergrounds are less common in Kyoto and Los Angeles. The lowest number of kilometers is found in Kyoto, with only 11 kilometers, while that in Los Angela is just marginally higher, at 28. The figures for passengers in both cities are almost comparable, at about 50 million.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontrast, undergrounds are less common in Kyoto and Los Angeles. The lowest number...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, while, in contrast, in particular, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13756613757 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78814392305 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1035584935 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241322677044 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105617520779 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545201316703 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16387267437 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487573413599 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontrast, undergrounds are less common in Kyoto and Los Angeles. The lowest number...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, while, in contrast, in particular, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13756613757 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78814392305 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.1035584935 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241322677044 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105617520779 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545201316703 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16387267437 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487573413599 0.0819641961636 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.