The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The given table describes Forest Area (in hectares) in various regions, in 1990, 2000 and 2005.
It can be deduced from the given information that the Forest Area in Africa and South America has significantly decreased. Whereas, it has increased in Asia and Europe, in the given time period of 25 years. In case of Oceania and North America, the change in Forest Area is comparatively negligible. Indeed, it can be said that the Forest Area in Oceania and North America has remained the same in the given period of time, that is, from 1990 to 2005. Oceania has the lowest Forest Area, as compared to all other regions given, for all three years under consideration. Europe and South America had comparable Forest Area in 1990 and 2000, but in 2005 the difference in Forest Area increased noticeably due to significant decrease in Forest Area in South America. Similarly, the Forest Area in the year 2000 can be said to be comparable in the regions of Africa and North America.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rica has remained the same in the given period of time, that is, from 1990 to 2005. Oceania ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
...t Forest Area, as compared to all other regions given, for all three years under consid...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75294117647 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57767900751 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464705882353 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9180998878 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0711232847546 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412701916717 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291903785086 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778759732338 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195695800172 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.