The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1000 people in 2003 in 6 different counties Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The table chart represents the information regarding the two electronics devices namely mobile phone and personal computer which was utilized by people of six different countries. Data is calibrated by thousands.

Overall, it is crystal clear that both electronic devices were the most popular in the Luxembourg while, the least number of people of china used computer and mobile phone.

Among all the countries, people of Luxembourg had the most cell phones and Pcs with number of 872 and 900 with respectively,in contrast, the number of people who were using personal computer remained constant in both countries Germany and South Korea, with 452 per hundred whereas, cell phones had quite more favorable device in Germany as compared to South Korea.

Further scrutinizing, almost same amount of people were attracted by Singapore (684 for cell phone and 690 personal computer), people of Italy utilized the second most highest cell phones (737). In last, the number of people accounted for personal computer with 88 per hundred in China and experienced a twofold rise then mobile phone.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clear that both electronic devices were the most popular in the Luxembourg whil...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were the most popular in the Luxembourg while, the least number of people of chi...
^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all the countries, people of Luxembourg had the most cell phones and Pcs with nu...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... number of 872 and 900 with respectively,in contrast, the number of people who wer...
^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2 and 900 with respectively,in contrast, the number of people who were using pers...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people who were using personal computer remained constant in both countries Germ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...Germany as compared to South Korea. Further scrutinizing, almost same amount of peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...er, people of Italy utilized the second most highest cell phones 737. In last, the number of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the highest'.
Suggestion: most the highest
...er, people of Italy utilized the second most highest cell phones 737. In last, the number of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple accounted for personal computer with 88 per hundred in China and experienced ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31609195402 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62641162995 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.7669816622 43.030603864 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.166666667 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256649754304 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135623250843 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753929773367 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169162858478 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03663641491 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clear that both electronic devices were the most popular in the Luxembourg whil...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were the most popular in the Luxembourg while, the least number of people of chi...
^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... all the countries, people of Luxembourg had the most cell phones and Pcs with nu...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
... number of 872 and 900 with respectively,in contrast, the number of people who wer...
^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2 and 900 with respectively,in contrast, the number of people who were using pers...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people who were using personal computer remained constant in both countries Germ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...Germany as compared to South Korea. Further scrutinizing, almost same amount of peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...er, people of Italy utilized the second most highest cell phones 737. In last, the number of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the highest'.
Suggestion: most the highest
...er, people of Italy utilized the second most highest cell phones 737. In last, the number of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple accounted for personal computer with 88 per hundred in China and experienced ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31609195402 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62641162995 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.7669816622 43.030603864 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.166666667 112.824112599 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256649754304 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135623250843 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753929773367 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169162858478 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03663641491 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.