The table shows the number of mobile phones and personal computers per 1000 people in 2003 in 6 different counties Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The assigned tabular chart compares the amount of mobile holders and PC owners per thousand people in 2003 among six countries, namely, Luxemburg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea,China.

From a perspective view, most countries had more than half of people had mobile in 2003, except for South Korea and China, In the meantime, China account for the minority of PC owners among six countries. While the other countries reminded at the higher level than China.

It is clear that Luxemburg hosted the highest rank in mobile holders with a figure of 872 per thousand people, which is nearly 2 times than South korea. Subsequently, Italy,Singapore and Germany had 737,684,586 mobile holders per thousand respectively. However, China stood at the last rank in mobile holders, merely 35 per thousand people.

In terms of number of PC owners, Luxemburg stood at the top among six countries, only 100 people did not owned PC per thousand people. followed by the Singapore, which had 690 PC holders per thousand people, ranked second among six countries. Italy,Germany and South Korea had the similar amount in PC owners, to be specific, 480 for Italy and 452 for Germany and South Korea. Whatelse, China stood at the lower level than the other countries in number of PC owners, which was less 10 times than Luxemburg.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Italy
...3 among six countries, namely, Luxemburg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea,China. ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Germany
...tries, namely, Luxemburg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea,China. From a perspectiv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , China
...burg,Italy,Singapore,Germany,South Korea,China. From a perspective view, most count...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ority of PC owners among six countries. While the other countries reminded at the hig...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Singapore
...es than South korea. Subsequently, Italy,Singapore and Germany had 737,684,586 mobile hold...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olders, merely 35 per thousand people. In terms of number of PC owners, Luxembu...
^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'own'
Suggestion: own
... six countries, only 100 people did not owned PC per thousand people. followed by the...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Followed
...e did not owned PC per thousand people. followed by the Singapore, which had 690 PC hold...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Germany
...ranked second among six countries. Italy,Germany and South Korea had the similar amount ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17289719626 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49771583627 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509345794393 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9693788091 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0871506187476 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450748392519 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295585893828 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0680633081608 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210814534348 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.