The table shows the percentage of people with mobile phones who use various features on their phone.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table illustrates various activities performed with or on the mobile phone, in three different periods of time: 2006, 2008 and 2010. Overall it can be seen that there is a general upward trend in using the mobile device for all activities, exclusively making calls which remained stable over the entirely given timeframe.
Looking at the details, taking photos and texting messages had seen a slight increase throughout the period, from 66% to 76% and from 73 to 79% respectively, figures which represented the second and third most commonly used among the given activities.
The number of people playing games or music more than doubled in 2010, as compared to 2006, from 41% and 26%
% to 17% and 12 %, respectively. Moreover, two featured which were highly used in 2010, were not available in 2006. They were represented by surfing on the internet, which rose dramatically to 41% in 2008 and hit a high of 73% in 2010 and also recording video, which witnessed a more moderate growth to 9%, before rocketing to a figure of 35%.
To conclude, despite the fact that calling the others remained the favourite activity performed by users of mobile phones, the other features were also increasingly used over the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given table illustrates various acti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble over the entirely given timeframe. Looking at the details, taking photos an...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...monly used among the given activities. The number of people playing games or mu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0, as compared to 2006, from 41% and 26% % to 17% and 12 %, respectively. Moreove...
^^^
Line 4, column 48, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'featured' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'features'.
Suggestion: features
...% and 12 %, respectively. Moreover, two featured which were highly used in 2010, were no...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98058252427 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65593563228 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660194174757 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8162003594 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.571428571 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4285714286 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117126501738 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599062943508 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549244017116 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0615266180458 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546054702887 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.