The table shows the proportions of public attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The table illustrates the number of students who attend various secondary schools from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, the percentage of people who studied at voluntary-controlled schools is far greater than those studying at specialist schools.
With regards to voluntary-controlled schools, which was contributed the higher percentage of students who attending the class in 2000 (52%) and 2005(38%); however, which was experience in a significant reduction over the time span and dropped to 20% at the end of the period (2009). Although community schools was had the least amount of people at the start of the year, reached a peak point at around six of tenth in 2009.
On other hand, both specialist and grammar schools, meanwhile, which were accounted less than a quarter population of all attendance throughout the period. Specialist school, there was not a great deal of difference between the number of students who attend the class in 2000, 2005 and 2009, it accounted only around one tenth. In terms of grammar school that was decreased gradually by approximately 6% in consequence years, which had 24%, 19% and 12% respectively in 2000, 2005 and 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 469, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich had 24%, 19% and 12% respectively in 2000, 2005 and 2009.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1871657754 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10783994229 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9613699236 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.571428571 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150236088965 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867846337955 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690518622769 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113005194303 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772687610733 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.