The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The given charts provide information about annual sales of two items, namely coffee and banana, in the years 1999 and 2004 in five different nations in Europe.
In general terms, it can be clearly seen that the largest amount of money was generated by selling coffee in the UK, whereas the smallest was produced by selling bananas in Sweden throughout the period shown.
Looking at the first chart in more detail, in 1999, Switzerland earned 3 million euros by selling coffee, and Denmark made 1.8 million euros. Meanwhile, the figures for the remaining nations ranged from 0.8 to 1.5 million euros. By 2004, the amount of money produced by coffee sales in the UK had risen rapidly from 1.5 to 20 million euros. In addition, that of money generated in Switzerland had grown twofold. In the meantime, sales of coffee in the remaining nations remained nearly stable.
Turning to the second chart more closely, in 1999, bananas' sales in Switzerland as well as Denmark were at 15 and 2 million euros respectively. Furthermore, money earned from selling bananas in Sweden and the UK stood at 1.8 and 1 million euros each. Between 1999 and 2004, there was a dramatic increase in the amounts of money acquired from selling bananas in the UK, Switzerland, and Belgium from 15, 1, and 0.6 million euros of 32, 4.5, and 3.4 million euros respectively. However, the figures for Sweden and Denmark approximately had halved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n five different nations in Europe. In general terms, it can be clearly seen...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Sweden throughout the period shown. Looking at the first chart in more detai...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing nations remained nearly stable. Turning to the second chart more closely...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, well, whereas, while, in addition, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98333333333 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54765687555 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491666666667 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0525575889 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.727272727 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172770805554 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750010818304 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856890357811 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137610636289 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103192857537 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.