The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labeled coffe and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European Countries. Summarise the information by selectimg and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Information below are tables in five European Countries of 1999 and 2004 about sales of bananas and fairtrade labeled coffee. Overall, in all of the times the states which got highest selling reach by Switzerland, at 68 millions euro whereas, Sweden had the lowest accomplishment just of 9.1 millions.
In 1999, United Kingdom sell fairtrade-labelled coffee for 1.5 millions and 1 million for bananas. Secondly, there Switzerland with the biggest revenue of bananas stood at 15 millions while 3 millions for coffee. Moreover, the production of coffee in Denmark finish at 1.8 millions slightly more than bananas which obtained of 2 millions. Therefore, just there deviation of 0.4, Belgium bring in one million for coffee and bananas of 0.6 million this is the least productive rather than others. Lastly, Sweden be derived the coffee simply just of 0.8 and 1.8 for bananas.
In 2004, after four years there big fluctuation of these countries. Firstly, Switzerland is the nation with which stayed in conformable position from the previously and increasingly got up to 47 for bananas and six for coffee. Afterwards, in the second place there UK which generated for 5.5 for bananas and coffee afford of 20 higher than Switzerland. However, Belgium in the middle position which received of coffee and bananas occurred to 1.7 and 4 millions. Subsequently, amount of procreation
got two millions from coffee and 0.9 millions produced through bananas be attained by Denmark. Ultimately, Sweden with similar result between coffee and bananas in the same year conduced for 1 millions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...d fairtrade labeled coffee. Overall, in all of the times the states which got highest sell...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'got the highest'.
Suggestion: got the highest
...l, in all of the times the states which got highest selling reach by Switzerland, at 68 mil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Belgium) must be used with a third-person verb: 'brings'.
Suggestion: brings
...e, just there deviation of 0.4, Belgium bring in one million for coffee and bananas o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, therefore, whereas, while, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24803149606 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85389624714 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562992125984 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7170084584 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.538461538 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128519761085 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678059961979 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133335841 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104493021633 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991175312644 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.