The two diagrams illustrate the number of coffee and bananas’ sales, with Fairtrade-labelled, between 1999 and 2004 over the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden.
Overall, the sales were usually increased, except for bananas in Sweden and Denmark. Likewise, it is clear that bananas’ sales in Switzerland became the largest trade.
As for the sales of coffee, Switzerland earned 3 millions of euros, which was the largest trade, rose to 6 millions of euros in 2004. The UK got a steadily rise from 1.5 to 20 millions of euros after 5 years, Denmark gained 1.8 millions of euros in 1999 and up to 2 millions of euros slightly in 2004. The profits in Belgium Sweden were the lowest, just took from 1 and 0.8 millions of euros at the beginning, to 1.7 and 1 million euros at the end.
In bananas’ sales, Switzerland was the leader from 15 to 47 millions of euros obviously, while the UK also raised consistently by 4.5 millions of euros at 1 million. Likewise, Belgium recorded an increase over the period, started at 0.6 million and ended at 4 million significantly. However, the incomes between Sweden and Denmark were also declined, from 1.8 and 2 millions of euros, separately, dropped to 1 and 0.9 millions of euros gradually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '3 million'.
Suggestion: 3 million
...the sales of coffee, Switzerland earned 3 millions of euros, which was the largest trade, ros...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...s, which was the largest trade, rose to 6 millions of euros in 2004. The UK got a steadily ri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...6 millions of euros in 2004. The UK got a steadily rise from 1.5 to 20 millions of euros after ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
... The UK got a steadily rise from 1.5 to 20 millions of euros after 5 years, Denmark gained 1.8...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...f euros after 5 years, Denmark gained 1.8 millions of euros in 1999 and up to 2 millions of e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...1.8 millions of euros in 1999 and up to 2 millions of euros slightly in 2004. The profits in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...were the lowest, just took from 1 and 0.8 millions of euros at the beginning, to 1.7 and 1 mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '47 million'.
Suggestion: 47 million
..., Switzerland was the leader from 15 to 47 millions of euros obviously, while the UK also rais...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...le the UK also raised consistently by 4.5 millions of euros at 1 million. Likewise, Belgium r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...enmark were also declined, from 1.8 and 2 millions of euros, separately, dropped to 1 and 0.9...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '9 million'.
Suggestion: 9 million
...f euros, separately, dropped to 1 and 0.9 millions of euros gradually.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, so, while, as for, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91079812207 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9910488251 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3733093621 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0899935746847 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055276074033 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542228789143 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891336110428 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061879100744 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.