three major problems in London during 3 years.
The graph depicts the proportion of litter, air quality, and noise in London over a period of 3 years . Overall, all figure have variation styles of pattern and it is clear that the number of garbage was only line graph that showed a fluctuation.
As it illustrated, in the first year percentage of garbage was 70% and it was the highest percentage of polution in that year. The next year, a quatity of waste climbed moderately and reached three quarters, the greatest contamination during a time frame. Furthermore, there were gradual decreasement between the second year and the last year, accounting for bellow 70% at the end of period.
In contrast, the amount of din and air condition did not displayed an fluctuation. Both of them saw a slightly decline during the time frame. The quanlity of air started with 68% of pollution. This percentage continiously declined gradually from the second year onward and at the end the percentage was just under 64% . Similarly, the quantity of din displayed drop pattern, starting at 58%, plummeting and ending at 52%, the lowest percentage among other figure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-12 | reverjae | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Phuong1810 | 11 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-11 | Lananhtranhanoi | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- passenger activity of Toronto Metro System, from Monday-Friday, July 2017 73
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Portugal, and Italy between 1967 and 2007. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph depicts the proportion of litter, air quality, a...
^^
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...noise in London over a period of 3 years . Overall, all figure have variation styl...
^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mber of garbage was only line graph that showed a fluctuation. As it illustrat...
^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of polution in that year. The next year, a quatity of waste climbed moderately an...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of waste climbed moderately and reached three quarters, the greatest contaminati...
^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'display'
Suggestion: display
...amount of din and air condition did not displayed an fluctuation. Both of them saw a slig...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...din and air condition did not displayed an fluctuation. Both of them saw a slightl...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
...played an fluctuation. Both of them saw a slightly decline during the time frame. The quanlity of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...he end the percentage was just under 64% . Similarly, the quantity of din displaye...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, second, similarly, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99459459459 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82186792794 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9212697203 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0601232290517 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270670788051 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436135844346 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0398987097072 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127421969412 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.