The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts indicate how yearly budgets of a UK school were dispensed for a variety of fee in 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively. In a brief observation, salaries for human resources accounted for large proportions of total expenditure consecutively whereas tiny segments were made up by insurance cost.
Firstly, it is apparent the pay for teachers represented the biggest percentage of all three charts throughout 20 years, about 40 - 50%. In opposition, other staffs' salaries showed remarkable abductions in the same period. Its numbers started at 28 per cent then reduced to 22 per cent and reached the point of 15 percent finally.
Turning to the other areas, there are gradual fluctuations regarding to the budgets for the school materials. Educational resources such as books occupied a quite small portion of 9% in 2001 despite the onset of 15% in 1981 and the expanding to 20% in 1991. With the reversed movements, the annual spending for internal stuffs made up 23% after declining to 5% in 1991 with the beginning of 15% in the past 20 years. Finally, the cost of insurance keep the same accelerations of increase to reach 9% in the third pie chart.
On the whole, while about half of total expenditure were paid for teachers' salaries, mere amounts spent for insurance expanded marginally in the end of the given period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to reach 9% in the third pie chart. On the whole, while about half of total ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, regarding, so, then, third, whereas, while, such as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98672566372 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82298778395 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628318584071 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3167794779 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.7 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132747569769 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548773377783 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579841181164 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738993570738 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530573363198 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.