The information about the changes in annual expenditure by a UK school in three different years is depicted by the rendered pie charts. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
To begin with, 40% of the spending on salaries of teachers in 1981. However, the annual expenditure by a UK school for resources and furniture and equipment was the same in 1981, it accounted for 15%. Moreover, the percentage of expenditure for workers' salaries was 28%. Only 2% of the annual spending by a UK school was noticed for insurance in 1981.
Moving towards, 22% and 20% of yearly spending by a UK school were seen in 1991 for workers' salaries and resources respectively. Furthermore, there was a drastic decrease observed in the spending on workers' salaries and books in 2001, it comprised to 15% and 9% correspondingly. In addition, a dramatic increase was noticed in the annual expense for furniture in a UK school in 2001, it was increased by 18%, it was 23%. 3% and 8% of annual spending on insurance in a UK school were noticed in 1991 and 2001. In 1991, the percentage of total spending on the salaries for teachers was 50%, but it was decreased by 5% in 2001.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the highest proportion of the annual spending in a UK school for salaries of teachers throughout the span.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69396551724 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89865161465 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435344827586 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3846914483 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237050721532 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114522330087 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807178934982 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162336879657 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352745208678 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.