The given pie graphs illustrate about the fluctuation of each year in a specific UK education in years 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, the proportion of teacher wages was higher than the others. In contrast, the figure for insurance was the least throughout all three years.
To begin, looking at the pie graph in 1991, obviously, the quantity of teacher's salaries stood at 50%, half as much as the total amount spent on education, was the highest one than those of the years 1981 and 2001. To be more specifics, the proportions of wages of teachers occupied respectively 40% and 45%. The opposite was true for the percentage of insurance, which formed slightly 3% in 1991. Furthermore, the insurance rate in 1981 was 2%, the least percentage of all. In comparison, the figure for insurance climbed significantly to 8% in 2001.
Second, the proportion of furniture and equipment was 23%, which was higher than in previous years.However, the proportion of resources was went down gradually to 9% whilst the biggest percentage of it in 1981 was 15%. Besides that, the share of wages paid to other employees fell progressively to 8% in 2001, was the lowest portion in comparison with 22% of the year 1991 and 28% of the year 1981.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given pie graphs illustrate about the fluctuation of each...
^^
Line 2, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1 and 2001. Overall, the proportion of teacher wages was higher than the others...
^^
Line 2, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was higher than the others. In contrast, the figure for insurance was the least t...
^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...which was higher than in previous years.However, the proportion of resources was went d...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of it in 1981 was 15%. Besides that, the share of wages paid to other employe...
^^
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lowest portion in comparison with 22% of the year 1991 and 28% of the year 1981....
^^
Line 4, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omparison with 22% of the year 1991 and 28% of the year 1981.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83886255924 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81131752219 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554502369668 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.33902439024 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6445054705 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116834422587 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0528949080346 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443642763875 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828245266202 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439416469392 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.