The three pie charts show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pie charts give an analysis of the expenditure of a UK based school in the years 1981, 1991 and 2001. From the given data, it can be seen that the school spent most of its annual budget on salaries. It is also seen that some avenues of expenditure such as furniture and equipment showed a fluctuating spending pattern, while spending on insurance showed a steady increase.
In 1981, teachers' salaries encompassed most of the expenditure which was 40% and the second-highest was the other salaries contributing 28%. Resources and furniture and equipment shared the same amount(15%) while insurance is responsible for the lowest amount of costing merely taking 2% of the total amount.
Teachers' salaries saw an increase of 10% in 1991 as well as resources such as books for which the increase was 5%. The school spent a smaller amount of money on furniture equipment and other salaries than in the previous decade which is 6% and 10% less respectively but insurance expenses rose up to 3%.
After 10 years, in 2001, the budget for teachers' salaries declined 5% but was still higher than it was in 1991. Furniture and equipment costs hiked up to 23% from 5% and so did insurance costings. Expenses on insurance climed up to 9% as both spending on workers' salaries and books fell down drastically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the previous decade which is 6% and 10% less respectively but insurance expenses...
^^
Line 17, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... equipment costs hiked up to 23% from 5% and so did insurance costings. Expenses ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, still, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90582959641 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73157856307 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515695067265 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.036010342 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126761557324 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583304936741 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729764057112 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828455359692 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867472973564 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.