Topic: The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The line diagrams gives information about the destination of students in both UK graduate and post graduate that they have pursued after finishing their university in 2008 besides some who had full-time jobs.
Overall, it is true that most of the UK graduates went to study further and postgraduates decided to study further or get part-time jobs in almost near proportion.
In figure one, among 30000 pupils, the least numbers of 3500 numbers went to do some voluntary work. Then, approximately near numbers of 16235 and 17735 students were unemployed or got a part-time jobs respectively. Finally, the high proportion of these graduates were allocated to them who decided to study in further degree with 29665 records.
In figure two, same as the other graph the biggest amount of students with 2725 numbers were devoted in further study category. Unlike the other chart, the next largest group of them were accepted to have part-time careers. Final two categories which had extremely fewer proportion with 1625 and just 345 for unemployed and voluntary work respectively.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- linear process 78
- One of the debating issues that everyone bad heard it at least once is global warming This issue has several causes and some effects on the Earth and some solutions that should be taken 56
- living in cities or countryside is one of the main decision for humans to make discuss advantages and disadvantages for both of them and give your own opinion 73
- In many countries people throw away a lot of food from restaurants and shops Why do you think people waste food in this way What can be done to reduce the amount of food thrown away 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, so, then, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24137931034 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70110051313 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4528663539 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173939302242 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711982211768 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588160566714 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112984899135 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602048315761 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.