The given bar charts illustrates information which related to the levels of expenditures on food and other items in different European countries in a decade. Overall, interestingly, all countries spent same percentage of their incomes on eating and other items, except England and it can be also seen that these 3 countries experienced significant increases in purchasing rates for both food and other types of goods.
With regards to food, France allotted 40% their money on in taking, which was 25% higher than the indicator was recorded in 1998. It is obviously seen that Germany allocated 25% of their income on it in 1998, and over the ten year this figures increased approximately 5%, reaching to 30%. The same disparity between the levels was observed in England, 10% in 1998 and 15% in 2008.
In terms of other commodities although France spent at around 10% on other items in 1998, after a decade, it climbed to 40%, which was equal to expending on food in this year. As can be observed from the chart, the money which was allotted to other categories by Germans was fairly similar to their expenditure on food purchasing, roughly 5% lower for each year. However, English allocation to the other goods was the closest numbers with food in 1998 while it rose over the period more than 4 times, climbed to 35%. (208 words) …..
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in a decade. Overall, interestingly, all countries spent same percentage of their...
^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...an 4 times, climbed to 35%. 208 words …..
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...times, climbed to 35%. 208 words …..
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60766646365 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578260869565 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4340330045 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270132360484 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109501950138 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750049119592 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18723888896 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754108622905 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.