The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps below represent some changes that were made on the island for tourism purposes.
It can be seen from the maps that lots of things were added, including accommodation and
traveling service, while not expanding the area of the island.
One of the most noticeable changes is the increase in the number of houses. Before constructing, the island didn’t have any resting places. After that, there were over 10 beach-style hostels added. Restaurant and reception were also built in order to provide tourists with convenience.
Not only the accommodation but also the traffic was developed. Since being renovated, the island became more easy-access. Footpath and vehicle track were added so that visitors are able to commute around it easily. Some activities like sailing or swimming were set up, which completely transformed this site into a touristy island. Besides those changes, the number of trees still remained the same, as well as their location.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, still, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25806451613 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.685917334 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.741935483871 0.547539520022 136% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2272347852 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0909090909 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0909090909 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130970824093 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448920799524 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520010081879 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0777160973505 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558319477628 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.