The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 to 2010.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons ư
The maps illustrate some proposed changes to the main road of the city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Over the period, the two roundabouts were construction on the main road to the city hospital. Various other developments with regard to the bus station and car park.
Looking at the maps in more detail, we can see that the first roundabout appeared to the south of the city hospital and it intersected with two roads is the ring road and the hospital road. The other roundabout erected near to the first roundabout and intersected with the hospital road and city road.
In the year 2010, the car park was divide into a public car park and a staff car park. The public car park located on the east of the city hospital. Next to the hospital road and situated at the left corner on the southeast of the city hospital is the staff car park. Finally, some bus stop on the hospital road innovated by a bus station located at the right corner of the city hospital and we could go straight to two roundabouts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-12-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city 67
- the chart below shows information about students studying in six main subjects at a US university in 2010 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- the illustrations show how chocolate is produced 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 to 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, look, so, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46195652174 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42841145265 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423913043478 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.690469049 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2222222222 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262786667735 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136131343919 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991155322236 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20112653923 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085908246577 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.