The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The illustrations represent the changes that took place on the surrounding road of the City Hospital from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the significant changes include the addition of various facilities such as car parking and roundabouts on the road access to the City Hospital.
According to the map, it is conspicuous that the City Hospital was surrounded by a ring road that led to hospital road in 2007, which remained the same in 2010. In addition to this, in 2007, the car parking area for staff and visitors of the hospital was on the right-hand side of the hospital road. Interestingly, there were multiple bus stops available on each side of the hospital road. The hospital road was intersecting with the city road in 20077.
In 2010, there were numerous changes nearby the city hospital. First and foremost, roundabouts were developed in the place of crossing roads between hospital road and city road as well as in the midst of city hospital and hospital road. On the east side of hospital road, the land which was previously occupied by the bus stop was replaced with the extension of the car parking for the employees of the hospital. However, parking facilities for the public were developed on the east side of the hospital. The enlarged bus station took place on the west of city hospital road and the road of the bus station was connected to both roundabouts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g road of the City Hospital from 2007 to 2010. Overall, it is clear that the s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80912863071 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65050080656 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.394190871369 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0597226786 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391142524226 0.215688989381 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187787309757 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111187245339 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267772416853 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872684688153 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.