The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps depict the way to get into the city hospital in two years. The former map displays accessibility of the road to the city hospital in 2007, while letter map illustrate road access in 2010.
To begin with, as is observed from the first map, the hospital road is located at the center of the map, which is main path to the city hospital. Coming along the city road, from east to west, there was an intersection and a branch road going toward north side, which is hospital road. Along the hospital road, three bus stops were constructed on the both side of this road. East of the hospital road, there was a car parking area for both staff and public with separate entrance. At the end of this road, the city hospital is situated, which was surrounded by the ring road.
By looking into next map, it can be seen that after three years, the development was remarkable. In 2010, Two roundabouts were constructed at the beginning and the end of the hospital road. In the east side of the hospital road, the bus stops were demolished and car parking area was build up only for staff with the same entrance. West of the hospital road, bus stops were replaced by the bus station. North of the city hospital, public car park was constructed.
In conclusion, it is clear that after three years of construction work, the hospital road area were modified for people convenience specially in parking facility. However, the city hospital, ring road and city road were remained the same.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63773584906 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41534786405 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445283018868 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2406720772 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7857142857 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264150924891 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122345803628 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794704350382 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203624487966 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910002940183 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.