The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The two maps illustrate the vast development of road access toward city hospital in the three year of period from 2007 to 2010.

Overall, the road access increased in size and more number of road have been constructed. More new car park have been added in the area. Meanwhile, the city hospital, the ring road and city road have been well-preserved.

In 2007, there was the main road named Hospital road running from south to the north, on the both side of the road lies bus stop. However the city hospital was at the end of the Hospital road, which was surrounded by the ring road.

The road witnessed a huge alternation after the construction work in the past three years. In 2010, new Bust station have been constructed on the west side of hospital road. Furthermore, new staff park have been made and also the public car park have been built in the east side of city hospital.However, it was the tremendous transformation which have made road better respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...he both side of the road lies bus stop. However the city hospital was at the end of the...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...constructed on the west side of hospital road. Furthermore, new staff park have b...
^^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...built in the east side of city hospital.However, it was the tremendous transformation w...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74705882353 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72159758701 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511764705882 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2126524682 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6666666667 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225601439154 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11714541516 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829550974631 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173287102409 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806559195091 0.0819641961636 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.