The pie charts demonstrate the information about how distinct types of expenses incurred by the house in 1950 and 2010 that mainly in the form of average.
Overall, it is palpable that the housing expenditure was abbreviated in comparison with initial year, whereas remain expenses were slightly augmented.
Generally, in 1950, the expenditure which related to housing lied upto 72.1% but during 2010, it was declined to 22.0%. Followed by, food and education expenses which were 11.2% and 6.6% respectively but there was little increment arised in the education expenditure by 0.3%, while food expenses covered the chart more than quarter proportion (34.0%) in 2010.
Analysing further, health care expenses elevated from 2.4% in 1950 to 4.5% in 2010.Furthermore, transportation and other expenditures were approximately 4.0% during 1950 but after 60 years, the transportation expenses were increased and become 14.0% which were less than the half quarter proportion and other expenditure aggrandized by 4.8%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urred by the house in 1950 and 2010 that mainly in the form of average. Overa...
^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich were 11.2% and 6.6% respectively but there was little increment arised in the...
^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...vated from 2.4% in 1950 to 4.5% in 2010.Furthermore, transportation and other expenditures ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62337662338 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02836982243 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5098751707 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.2 112.824112599 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192567672961 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113370950954 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472320816357 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120742597807 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515860186323 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.91 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.