This report derives from the Pie chart, which illustrates online sales for retail important goods in Canada in 2005 & 2010. The diagram represents the electronic & appliances, food & beverages, home goods and video games in four parts with varied percentages.
Generally speaking, in 2005, electronic & appliances projected higher percentage as video games gains the lowest. In 2010, food & beverages mushroomed the online sales, while home furnishing pertained to the lowest.
In 2005, the electronic & appliances gained 35% online sales; however, the sales in 2010 decrease slightly to 30%. In the contrast, the online sales of video games in 2005, emphasize to 18%, but after five years it surge to 23%. In overall, the online sales percentage of electronic & appliances and video games were equal when they added in 2005 & 2010.
In the same manner, the online sales were varied in some goods and their was a dramatic fluctuation in between the percentages. Although, in 2005, the food & beverages pertained to 22% online sales, there is tremendous change in 2010, which shown a difference of 10% in between them. In opposite, the online sales of home furnishing was 25% in 2005, but it downgrades to 15% in 2010. In overall, the sum of percentages in 2005 & 2010 of food & beverages and home furnishing were equal.
This report derives from the…
This report derives from the Pie chart, which illustrates online sales for important retail goods in Canada in 2005 & 2010. The diagram represented the electronic & appliances, food & beverages, home goods, and video games in four parts with varying percentages.
Generally speaking, in 2005, electronics & appliance projected a higher percentage as video games gain the lowest. In 2010, food & beverages mushroomed online sales, while home furnishing pertained to the lowest.
In 2005, the electronics & appliances gained 35% online sales; however, sales in 2010 decreased slightly to 30%. The online sales of video games in 2005 emphasize to 18%, but after five years it surges to 23%. Overall, the online sales percentage of electronics & appliance and video games were equal when they added in 2005 & 2010.
The online sales varied in some goods, and there was a dramatic fluctuation in between the percentages. Although in 2005, the food & beverages pertained 22% online sales, there was a tremendous change in 2010, which showed a difference of 10% between them. In opposite, the online sales of home furnishing were 25% in 2005, but it downgraded to 15% in 2010. The sum of percentages in 2005 & 2010 of food & beverages and home furnishing were equal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sales in 2010 decrease slightly to 30%. In the contrast, the online sales of video...
^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'surges'?
Suggestion: surges
...phasize to 18%, but after five years it surge to 23%. In overall, the online sales pe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
..., but after five years it surge to 23%. In overall, the online sales percentage of...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... equal when they added in 2005 & 2010. In the same manner, the online sales were ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16901408451 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76275090628 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488262910798 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.9891492132 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193943986151 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920679466649 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743826716785 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130958161661 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474006537036 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.