The given two pie charts compare the percentage of Canadian online sales in four different retail sectors between the year 2005 and 2010.
Looking at the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that sales of electronics and appliances increased consistently over 5 years, while people of Canada decreased the purchasing of the remaining two items from 2005 to 2010.
Having a glimpse at the illustration reveals that sales of video games were 18 percents in the former year compared to more than 5 percents in the later year. The percentile of home furnishing lessened from 25 percents to 15 percents in the year 2010.
Shifting to the remaining data, it is clear from the pie chart that sales of food and beverage were only 22 percents in the year 2005, but in the latter year, sakes of similar product improved by 10 percents. Also, the largest online sales were for electronics and appliances accounted as 35 percents in the year 2005 and ameliorated by 5 percents in the year 2010.
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment
- Some people think that telling the truth is not always essential It is necessary to tell lies sometimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think parents are responsible for transporting their children to school while others believe it is the responsibility of the government Discuss both sides and give your opinion 61
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o more than 5 percents in the later year The percentile of home furnishing lessen...
^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat sales of food and beverage were only 22 percents in the year 2005 but in the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77058823529 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64918215492 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 170.0 22.4926829268 756% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 811.0 112.824112599 719% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 170.0 22.9334400587 741% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 30.0 5.23603664747 573% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171899101275 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171899101275 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135970268577 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784281133895 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 86.0 13.2329268293 650% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -84.15 61.2550243902 -137% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 67.2 10.3012195122 652% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.57 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.16 8.06136585366 200% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.4329268293 481% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 70.0 10.9970731707 637% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 55.0 11.0658536585 497% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.