The two pie charts give information about expenditure on internet trading for retail areas in Canada for 2005 and 2010.
Overall, it is clearly evident that, electronics & appliance and home furnishings experienced a notable decline, whereas, the shopping trend in food & beverage and video games saw a rise over the period.
Moving to a more detailed analysis, sales made on electronics & appliance were by far the most predominant in 2005, but became the second most notable purchases in 2010, at approximately a third. Similarly, sales of home furnishings decreased from a quarter to 15 % in 2010, accounting for the least patronage.
In stark contrast to the fall in market for electronics & appliance, both food & beverage and video games saw an upward trend. More precisely, food & beverage had become the most popular item in 2010, from 22% (2005) to around a third in 2010. Rising from 18% to 23 %, sales made on video games moved from the least concern to the third popular in the market.
- With the rise of ebooks comes the decline in paper books. Some people see this as a good forward step while others do not. What are advantages and disadvantages of this trend? 61
- The bar graph indicates sales figures for reading materials from 2002 to 2012.Write a report to a university lecturer describing the information shown below.Write at least 150 words 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 78
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, similarly, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04242424242 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7677903769 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0383144149 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.857142857 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177757143661 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923210804359 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100451056738 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131588068495 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118141510018 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.