The given pictures illustrate the process of how aluminum cans are recycled.
Overall, the flowchart consists of 6 distinct steps, beginning with collecting used aluminum products and ending with reusing cans.
At the initial stage, aluminum cans after being utilized for numerous purposes are collected at recycling spots. Then, such products experience cleaning, sorting, shredding, and compression period, respectively by special equipment to remove completely dust and wasted stuff inside. After that, aluminum cans are shipped to a factory, where they are heated at a high temperature to transfer from rigid to liquid form.
At the fourth step, liquid aluminum is rolled into thick patterns, which range from 2.5 mm to 6 mm based on different commercial purposes. Then, rolled plates become the main material for producing new aluminum products through the recycling process in factories. Finally, recycled cans are redistributed to consuming destinations to put an end to this process by reusing period. According to the US statistics, about 74% of the aluminum cans on the US market stem from recycled ones.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, then, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46242774566 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78968664286 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658959537572 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2217125329 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123849713738 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578200808613 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416397172894 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776048897692 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034340163638 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, then, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46242774566 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78968664286 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658959537572 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2217125329 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123849713738 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578200808613 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416397172894 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776048897692 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034340163638 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.