The supplied charts represent the ratio of an average family expenditures on home-cooked or restaurant meals in each decade from 1970 to 2000. Meanwhile, the graph depicts the number of meals ordered in different restaurant - fast food and sit down ones.
In general, there was a significant change in sendings on meals over 30 years. Firstly, a vast majority of people preferred cooking at home in 1970, whereas this percentage fell down to 75%, still remaining more popular than buying prepared food in restaurants in the next 10 years. Similarly, considerably more people started spending approximately two-thirds of their budget on restaurant meals in 1990. By 2000, the ratio of family expenses had equally divided between self-cooked meals and restaurant ones.
Considering the quantity of number of orders in the restaurants per year, fast-food meals gradually rose in demand between 1970 to 1980. After this slight changes, I do not eat the increase in number of meals bought occured. By the end of 30-year period, it had grown up to nearly 90 meals. By contrast, sit down restaurants had less considerable rise, increasing roughly two times from 1970 to 2000.
Overall, people started to spend more money on restaurant meals during this period. Likewise, such places had gained a popularity.
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
- Some people think that formal education should start for children as early as possible. While others think that it should not start until 7 years of age. discuss both views and give your opinion 96
- The two maps below shows road access to a hospital in 2007 and in 2009 56
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world. Why do you think it is important to do so? What will be the effect if children are not taught history?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, likewise, similarly, still, third, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20476190476 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80414970041 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6207717688 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0833333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356756872021 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131410414249 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905498205683 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225717674203 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791019245236 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.