The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant.

the line graph represents the percentage of visitors to Scotland who visited four different attractions between 1980 and 2010.
Overall castle and zoo increased whereas aquarium , festival decreased . In 1980 the number of tourists visited castle about 25% and the zoo was approximately 10% and in 1995 the number visitors who visited castle peaking up around 45% , the zoo was slightly fluctuate about 10% and the last in 2010 the castle increase in around 33% , the zoo was increase significantly about 20% On the other hand , the aquarium and festival were decrease. In 1980 the number of tourist visited aquarium approximately 20% , the festival was the highest about 30% . In 1995 , the festival decrease around 25% , the aquarium was increase slightly ,in 2010 at the end the festival was decrease about 29% and the aquarium to reduce approximately 10%

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the line graph represents the percentage of...
^^^
Line 2, column 50, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...astle and zoo increased whereas aquarium , festival decreased . In 1980 the number...
^^
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ed whereas aquarium , festival decreased . In 1980 the number of tourists visited ...
^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...who visited castle peaking up around 45% , the zoo was slightly fluctuate about 10...
^^
Line 2, column 259, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: fluctuated
...ng up around 45% , the zoo was slightly fluctuate about 10% and the last in 2010 the cast...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 2010 the castle increase in around 33% , the zoo was increase significantly abou...
^^
Line 2, column 398, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ignificantly about 20% On the other hand , the aquarium and festival were decrease...
^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...urist visited aquarium approximately 20% , the festival was the highest about 30% ...
^^
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., the festival was the highest about 30% . In 1995 , the festival decrease around ...
^^
Line 2, column 550, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he festival was the highest about 30% . In 1995 , the festival decrease around 25%...
^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ival was the highest about 30% . In 1995 , the festival decrease around 25% , the ...
^^
Line 2, column 592, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 1995 , the festival decrease around 25% , the aquarium was increase slightly ,in ...
^^
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...25% , the aquarium was increase slightly ,in 2010 at the end the festival was decr...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 32.9175257732 0% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 26.3917525773 91% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 714.0 937.175257732 76% => OK
No of words: 139.0 206.0 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13669064748 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.78020617076 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77770919484 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 63.0 127.690721649 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453237410072 0.622605031667 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 206.1 290.88556701 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6804123711 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 16.3608247423 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.70071633 44.8134815571 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.8 76.5299724578 187% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 16.8248392259 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 4.34317383033 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.29896907216 47% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 2.54639175258 511% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106836999265 0.216113520407 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914479395977 0.0766984524023 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128052589431 0.0603063233224 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191533271778 0.12726935374 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150615812621 0.0580467560999 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 8.37731958763 199% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 70.7449484536 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 7.45979381443 169% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 8.71597938144 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 41.2886597938 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 8.54432989691 150% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.