In this day and age, more and more contemporary attention has been placed on whether or not to build new homes in the countryside. Some people assert that constructing new homes in rural areas is less important than the protection of these zones. In my opinion, the countryside is the majority of farming and agriculture which provide food and fabrics to the cities; however, we can build new homes there without damaging it.
Developing suburbs in rural areas might have egregious consequences for the cities. Food has been harvested for many years and farmers know exactly the number of crops that they will produce at the end of the season. Moreover, building new homes in the countryside could create a huge issue to farmers as they might be located to an unknown zone. Therefore, they will have to learn the weather, soils , pests there , as a consequence , they might have a decline in the amount of crops in comparison to the previous area, which in turn results in a skyrocketing in the market price.
On the other hand, with the increasing population, the demand for new residences is also rising. It is observed that, nowadays, the cities are so heavily over-crowded that there is always a limit to exploiting the space for construction.
Therefore, by building new homes in uncultivated areas of countryside, the problems could be avoidable. This is lying in unused and if it can be converted into residential areas, it would not only ensure a fair distribution of population but help in reducing traffic problems like traffic congestion or environmental issues as air pollution as well.
From these above mentioned reasons, the conclusion can be drawn that a diligent construction plan for new homes keeping in mind the preservation of environment in the countryside will be a win-win situation. It will not only cater to the increasing demand for residential areas but also preserve the beauty and purity of the countryside
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ntemporary attention has been placed on whether or not to build new homes in the countryside. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople assert that constructing new homes in rural areas is less important than th...
^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey will have to learn the weather, soils , pests there , as a consequence , they m...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o learn the weather, soils , pests there , as a consequence , they might have a de...
^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., soils , pests there , as a consequence , they might have a decline in the amount...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 4.92783505155 264% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.85567010309 337% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 937.175257732 173% => OK
No of words: 324.0 206.0 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 3.78020617076 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92329468026 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 127.690721649 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546296296296 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 290.88556701 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0525167986 44.8134815571 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 76.5299724578 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 16.8248392259 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 4.34317383033 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345575649416 0.216113520407 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121012357048 0.0766984524023 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875920078275 0.0603063233224 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177970100652 0.12726935374 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119711940443 0.0580467560999 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 8.37731958763 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 70.7449484536 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 41.2886597938 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ntemporary attention has been placed on whether or not to build new homes in the countryside. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople assert that constructing new homes in rural areas is less important than th...
^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey will have to learn the weather, soils , pests there , as a consequence , they m...
^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o learn the weather, soils , pests there , as a consequence , they might have a de...
^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., soils , pests there , as a consequence , they might have a decline in the amount...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 4.92783505155 264% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.85567010309 337% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 937.175257732 173% => OK
No of words: 324.0 206.0 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 3.78020617076 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92329468026 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 127.690721649 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546296296296 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 290.88556701 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.13402061856 77% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0525167986 44.8134815571 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 76.5299724578 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 16.8248392259 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 4.34317383033 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 7.41237113402 94% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345575649416 0.216113520407 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121012357048 0.0766984524023 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875920078275 0.0603063233224 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177970100652 0.12726935374 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119711940443 0.0580467560999 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 8.37731958763 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 70.7449484536 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 8.71597938144 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 7.59969072165 117% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 41.2886597938 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.