The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.
The chart shows average distances that people in England travelled using different forms of transport in the years 1985 and 2000.
It is clear that the total number of miles travelled by English people using all modes of transport increased significantly between 1985 and 2000. The car was by far the most used form of transport in both years.
In 1985, the average person travelled 3,199 miles by car, and this rose to 4,806 miles in the year 2000. The figures for miles travelled by train, long distance bus, taxi and other modes also increased from 1985 to 2000. Travel by taxi saw the most significant change, with more than a threefold increase from 13 miles per person per year in 1985 to 42 miles in 2000.
There was a fall in the average distances for three forms of transport, namely walking, bicycle and local bus. In 1985, English people walked an average of 255 miles, but this figure fell by 18 miles in 2000. Bicycle use fell from 51 to 41 miles over the period shown, while the biggest downward change was in the use of local buses, with average miles per person falling from 429 to 274 over the 15-year period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 231, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...00. In the same period, bicycle use saw a slightly decrease by 10 miles, from 51 miles in 1985, whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 26.3917525773 140% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 195.0 206.0 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49230769231 4.54256449028 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18714191208 2.54303337028 86% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 127.690721649 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497435897436 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 290.88556701 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.9944440586 44.8134815571 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 76.5299724578 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 16.8248392259 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 4.34317383033 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202382205233 0.216113520407 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108531318179 0.0766984524023 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672244643609 0.0603063233224 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154306627595 0.12726935374 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668905449982 0.0580467560999 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 8.37731958763 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 70.7449484536 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 8.71597938144 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 7.59969072165 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 41.2886597938 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 8.62886597938 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.