Dear Sir,
Let me introduce myself first. I am Rena. I am writing this letter of reference with regards to the job (Financial manager vacancy) applied by my colleague. To begin with, Jessica and I are working in the Finance department in Deloitte since 3 years and it has been pleasure working with her.
Furthermore, talking about her educational qualifications, Jessica graduated from Central Michigan University in the year 2014, majored in Supply Chain Finances and was a gold medalist. Her article 'The role of finances in Supply Chain management' was published in New York Business Times and won 'Exceptional research' award in the year 2016. In addition, she is a person loaded with a lot of skills. Contrary to being an introvert in personal life, she has been a people's person, an ardent team-player and displays phenomenal management and leadership skills at work. Jessica was awarded a 'Leadership award' for displaying bias for action during annual rewards and recognition program-2017 in Deloitte.
I recommend Jessica for the role of Financial manager in your organization, on the grounds of her exceptional intelligence, practical knowledge, management and leadership qualities. I believe that she could be an asset who brings value to your organization and strives for the development of the company as well as her profession. Your diligence and esteemed concern will play a prominent role in her career growth.
Should you have any concerns or need further clarification, you can contact me on +0120-9567820 or send an email to Rena@rocket-mail.
Yours faithfully,
Rena.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce department in Deloitte since 3 years and it has been pleasure working with he...
^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...rovert in personal life, she has been a peoples person, an ardent team-player and displ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
... you can contact me on +0120-9567820 or send an email to Rena@rocket-mail. Yours faithfull...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, as for, in addition, talking about, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 32.9175257732 82% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.85567010309 363% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 937.175257732 143% => OK
No of words: 253.0 206.0 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31225296443 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.78020617076 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15987573101 2.54303337028 124% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 127.690721649 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.622605031667 103% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 290.88556701 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.13402061856 109% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2314822127 44.8134815571 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 76.5299724578 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 16.8248392259 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 4.34317383033 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194950175218 0.216113520407 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621713508064 0.0766984524023 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567284126537 0.0603063233224 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100120203502 0.12726935374 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397878081466 0.0580467560999 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 8.37731958763 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 7.59969072165 124% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 41.2886597938 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.