Dear Sam,
I am writing to express my gratitude for being a very supportive co-worker. Apparently, the book you lent me last week, "Speaking Picture", was very resourceful in making my presentation this week at office.
Conveying the importance of documentation is often a challenge for anyone. Especially, because the developers always presume that documentation is just a tool that helps the end users and writers only word smith the content. Increasingly, there has been a need to create awareness about how crucial a document for a product to the software engineers. Taking on the challenge of presenting a topic about "Documentation is a product", was not easy. The presentation was a great success and everyone in the room left the room with a new found respect for the work that the documentation team does.
Nonetheless, I would not have been able to make such an impressive presentation if it was not for the book that you lent me.
Pictures speak a thousand words and I was able to put forth all the disadvantages of not having a proper document. Customers, usually check on the website and do their research before they invest any money in a new technology. The first product that any company sells is their document.
I am grateful to you for all the support and encouragement that you provide me at work.
Your sincerely,
Rajie
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, nonetheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 32.9175257732 76% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 26.3917525773 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 937.175257732 123% => OK
No of words: 229.0 206.0 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03930131004 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25980119735 2.54303337028 128% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 127.690721649 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606986899563 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 290.88556701 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5454538576 44.8134815571 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7692307692 76.5299724578 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6153846154 16.8248392259 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 4.34317383033 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245502077032 0.216113520407 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779618031305 0.0766984524023 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918913189838 0.0603063233224 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160235051964 0.12726935374 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103272601006 0.0580467560999 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 8.37731958763 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 8.71597938144 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 41.2886597938 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.