Dear Sir/Madam,
I am writing to you to express my appreciation for the extra efforts exhibited by one of your staff. Their attention to my needs improved my experience with your store. Allow me to elaborate.
I have been a regular customer of your store and have met with a lot of managers. However, one manager named Mr. Macomara is a gem of a person. The biggest quality of Mr. Macomara is attention to detail. I have a minor disability and nobody had noticed it.
However, yesterday he noticed it during our first meeting and sent a shopping helper with me to carry the trolley around and collect heavy items. I am so moved by his act of kindness and attention to detail. I cannot stop thinking about it.
Further, I have always recommended everyone in our neighbourhood to shop at your store. Now I have decided that I spread about the excellent services which are given by your store to disabled and old people.
I hope that your store carries out doing amazing things for people of our locality.
Yours sincerely,
Brad Jason
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs improved" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'improving' or 'to be improved'.
Suggestion: improving; to be improved
...your staff. Their attention to my needs improved my experience with your store. Allow me...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le of our locality. Yours sincerely, Brad Jason
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 32.9175257732 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 26.3917525773 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72826086957 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61988091188 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 127.690721649 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 290.88556701 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 1.44329896907 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 16.3608247423 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7986189029 44.8134815571 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.1428571429 76.5299724578 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1428571429 16.8248392259 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 4.34317383033 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153491921808 0.216113520407 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478858686802 0.0766984524023 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503115859827 0.0603063233224 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822913903095 0.12726935374 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566513830374 0.0580467560999 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 8.37731958763 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 70.7449484536 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.27 8.71597938144 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 7.59969072165 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 8.54432989691 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.2247191011 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.25 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.