Over the years, the car ownership has increased significantly. This has caused many cities around the globe facing the problem of traffic congestion whenever people travel within cities. I agree with the increasing on car ownership and I believe if governments take some action plan, this issue can be solved to a certain extent. In this essay, I will discuss my perspective on the mentioned statement and will recommend some measures that government can consider to discourage people to use their cars.
In my opinion, the car ownership increases over the years is due to it is the most convenient means of transport for the people living in the cities. The car can travel them to the place where public transports could not be reached such as the working places and schools. By owning a car, they do not have to rush to the office by waking up early in the morning to take trains or buses. However, as the cities are now ‘one big traffic jam’, people shall consider taking public transports to reduce traffic congestion in the cities.
Another reason contributes to the problem of traffic congestion is because the car retailers offer discounts to the people to attract them to buy new cars. Besides, the deposit the buyer has to pay is very low and the car can be repaid with loan instalments at low interest. All these have caused the roads become very congested and people will have to take longer time on their journey to the destinations if they choose to travel by cars.
There are some suggested measures that governments can take to deal with this issue. Firstly, governments have to remove car subsidies so that people find the car as an unaffordable item. Secondly, the public transports should be upgraded in term of quality so that people find it comfortable taking trains and buses to schools and offices. For instance, when I travelled to Singapore last year end, I found the MRT service in Singapore was so excellent as the train can reach the destinations I wanted to travel, not to mention offices and schools. With this excellent service, I observed there were fewer cars on the roads.
The other measure governments can consider is the road taxes imposed on cars shall be raised. This will make people to reconsider whether to drive a car or take public transports as the raise in taxes means their burdens will be heavier. Another point worth to mention is to limit the number of cars driving on the roads. For instance, in China, the number of 8 on the car plate cannot be driven on the roads on Tuesday.
In summary, traffic congestion will bring air pollution to the cities. People shall think of the advantages and disadvantages of driving a car. It is worth to choose public transports if expenses on cars cannot be afford by people. It is important for governments to take some actions to deal with this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider discouraging'.
Suggestion: consider discouraging
...mmend some measures that government can consider to discourage people to use their cars. In my opi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'as to', 'for instance', 'in summary', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.263837638376 0.247107548796 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.178966789668 0.15552993741 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0535055350554 0.0946569551029 57% => OK
Adverbs: 0.029520295203 0.0501201869031 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0369003690037 0.0437536398559 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114391143911 0.122223957237 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0387453874539 0.0403219363162 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58884706574 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0571955719557 0.0326786765898 175% => OK
Particles: 0.00184501845018 0.00163938923432 113% => OK
Determiners: 0.112546125461 0.0861751148067 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0369003690037 0.0214082191602 172% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00553505535055 0.0119246538136 46% => More subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, whom, Whose, That.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2866.0 1933.38276553 148% => OK
No of words: 496.0 316.052104208 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77822580645 6.10592293882 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.20519365927 112% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.354838709677 0.37474360046 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.233870967742 0.284197041944 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.151209677419 0.203843217982 74% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110887096774 0.137313986986 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58884706574 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451612903226 0.560935902166 81% => OK
Word variations: 51.5000684995 60.7401812628 85% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0911823647 149% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6666666667 20.7725350517 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.923145051 49.5273876611 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.416666667 93.4120437189 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 15.2821509519 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.583333333333 0.594174754866 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.39078156313 137% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01102204409 20% => OK
Readability: 44.0537634409 49.1922392462 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.6992481203 1.69127372897 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429603415874 0.332604825255 129% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.116352845459 0.102734651613 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0618768312017 0.0668474354756 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.562357429488 0.534917948617 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.113638141489 0.148666948902 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175845683665 0.13441755203 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058080555067 0.0742828286743 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.468047781514 0.324241079732 144% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0483053966083 0.0640056729886 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291329359465 0.22793763319 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624384595187 0.0582452615562 107% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41883767535 205% => Too many neutral sentences.
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.88977955912 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.60220440882 231% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.00200400802 250% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.493987976 152% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 6.5 Out of 9