Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are
noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately.
Do you agree or disagree with this view? Give reasons for your answer and include
any relevant examples from your experience.
Educating children to be a useful person in society has never been a simple issue because it involve in a long-term process of shaping their behaviours and attitudes. That can be demonstrated by the fact that in many schoold, there still exists a certain number of students those who is not well-educated and less cared by their parents have a substantial impact on other students. To overcome this problem, there was a statement that those students shoulbd be separated into a small group for further teaching. However, I am of the opinion that to educate rude or annoying students well, we should not isolate them from their class and must help them have a best environment for improving themselves.
It can be understandable that each child in the process of development is similar to a white paper and any small change in their environment will also shape their temporary behavious or attitudes. For particular, when children are exposed to action films on a regular basis, they have a tendency to imitate violent actions of movie stars for solving their problems. In addition, family is also viewd as a source of children’s characteristics because they usually watch the way their parents show feeling and gesture and consider that as a right model. As a result, they are likely to behave to other people in the same way in particular situations.
To overcome this problem, isolating those disobedient students is a less efficient solution because it is likely to worsen their situation. In contrast, focusing on enhancing the quality of their study environment and watching their behaviours or attitudes at class is a proper way for steering them to an useful development. Any advice that they listen to will be a valuable drug to make them think and behave better than before. In my childhood, I had been stuck in thoughts of being a professional criminal because I was so addicted to violent games. But, due to my parents’ effort to encourage me to study for a brighter future, I gradually felt their unconditional love and so I changed my lifestyle in a better way.
To sum up, children is always a precious property to our society and country. To nurture them efficiently, teachers and families should cooperate together in guiding them towards the best things of their life. On the other hand, isolating them from their environment for better teaching must be banned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'involves'?
Suggestion: involves
...as never been a simple issue because it involve in a long-term process of shaping their...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 658, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...rom their class and must help them have a best environment for improving themselv...
^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ss is a proper way for steering them to an useful development. Any advice that the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, in addition, in contrast, in particular, as a result, to sum up, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 24.0651302605 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94029850746 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86141457568 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7883255356 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145931925145 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530582796775 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466836210094 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942277956294 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495427317126 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.