Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Modern technology plays a vital role in preventing and solving crimes in society.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
In many parts of the world today, more folks have concerned about criminal issues. It is hypothesized that more sabotages from crimes have spontaneously decreased in comparison with the past due to enhancements of technologY. This essay attempts to point out that this statement is quite convincible.
To begin with, there have been numerous people who are in favor of the idea. First and foremost, current gadgets in all probability render aids FOR locating positions of criminal organizations. This can be fathomed that most devices which are robbed can be navigated to recover. By virtue of the fact that smart technologies consist numerous chips, cameras and the like, so SUSPECT areaS would be restricted easily. A case in this point, following CNN channel, due to these smart elements, the figure for crimes have been continuously reduced in most regions. This means that most robbers have been frightened about these spectacular abilities of technologies. As a bonus, modern devices will probably detect criminal problems immediately so that dwellers can trigger tactics in order to resist detrimental consequences. It is obvious that cameras are acknowledged to be the most crucial stuff in all spectacles at the moment. It is handy for hosts to examine circumstances from REMOTE destinations, and these gadgets can connect to police officers punctually if some settings of them are established. Indeed, governors of most nations have encouraged their inhabitants to pursue camera systems, so deleterious situations are restricted. Another possibility is that technologies are beneficial for managing immigrations or others. Data are analyzed in short periods, and machines which can recognize faces can divulge activities of illegal visitors. Apart from that, forbidden factors can be realized inside subjects. Highlight for this point, in VNN plus articles, according to strict equipments ( X scanning machines ), banned drugs have been recovered by securities in enormous figures. As a result, every countries have implemented these equipments to resist sabotages from transportation.
Vice versa, there have been diverse views which reject the idea. One of those are that criminal subjects can utilize these sources to create more obstacles. This can be understood that convicts will probably PENETRATE systems to observe prospects if they are brilliant sufficient in knowledge. This view is demonstrated in most sci-fi films. However, these cases are paid attention by various securities today, so systems are secured with numerous stages by smartest people. In fact, it is reluctant for smart machines to be carefully tested before being approachable to lives. These are rules which have been implemented by governments. FortunATELY, there have not been any akin cases in modern world.
In brief, the idea is quite persuadable by aforementioned evidences. By contrast, drawbacks of these aspects need to be regarded in order to sustain expected situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e subjects. Highlight for this point, in VNN plus articles, according to strict e...
^^
Line 2, column 1597, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...articles, according to strict equipments X scanning machines , banned drugs have ...
^^
Line 2, column 1618, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...o strict equipments X scanning machines , banned drugs have been recovered by sec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, apart from, in brief, in fact, in short, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 13.1623246493 274% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2514.0 1615.20841683 156% => OK
No of words: 456.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51315789474 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99970232201 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 506.74238477 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5434324364 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46428571429 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.06650968402 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0197403426713 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0217728980562 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0376573358149 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250954571925 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 163.0 78.4519038076 208% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.