Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on
expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree
Public libraries are great source of information. Many people believe that only books should be provided in public libraries, and having DVDs and videos there is waste of money. I completely disagree with this notion because these new storage devices can profoundly benefit our countries.
The primary reason why I believe public libraries should invest on DVDs and videos is that using these sources can reduce the number of trees that are being cut down every day. Papers are made from wood , the main source of wood is forests and jungles, which provide oxygen for our planet. Books require a sizeable number of trees and eliminating them by other sources can be beneficial for the environment. Therefore, Using DVDs not only can save a vast number of trees, but it will also have provided us with cleaner environment within a few years.
On the other hand, DVDs and videos have longer life cycles. Despite advances that have been made in increasing the life cycle of books, keeping them in secure places in museums for instance, they are not as durable as DVDs, or videos that are usually made out of recycled plastic. If libraries invest on DVDs and other types of data storage devices, they will greatly reduce their expenditure in the long run. In other words, the more investments on recent storage technology, the lower the cost would be.
In conclusion, I would rather our government invested on DVDs and videos for libraries rather than new books, because in this way not only can we save our forests, but we could also save money to invest on other necessary aspects of our country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...s and videos there is waste of money. I completely disagree with this notion because these ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...wn every day. Papers are made from wood , the main source of wood is forests and ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97833935018 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57945775271 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57761732852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4254885741 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.363636364 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195901927507 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084207488174 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826968189874 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132194006068 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747436456638 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.