It is undoubtedly true that career progression inspires employees to work harder. However, it is often claimed that the length of work should be taken for granted when it comes to chose potential promoted. Personally, I do not agree with this opinion. From my point of view, seniority is not the only criterion for deciding who deserves to be promoted; a contribution to the development of a company is another criterion.
To begin with, rich length of work gives an advantage when it comes to promotion. This is because gained experience tends to provide a profound understanding of the whole workflow. In other words, it would mean that experienced staff has already had higher productivity for the reason they have fulfilled their job responsibilities for many years. For instance, in order to become a senior developer, a programmer have to go through a junior position and a middle one, where not only experienced is gained but also horn their knowledge. It is therefore clear that employees with many years of experience may compare very favourably with newcomers in the question who deserves a better career progression.
Despite this fact, there is another measure to define who should be promoted such as personal contribution to the development of a company. This is an essential factor since it plays a key role in the thriving of company and rapid revenue growth. What I mean by this, no matter how long employees have worked in a company if their ideas or achievements make a boost towards prosperity. Moreover, promotion on a higher position may come in useful for employers inasmuch as a promoted staff tend to work harder making a new breakthrough at a new place with pay increments. This kind of incentive may bring about an aspiration to lead a company to flourish. Therefore, the significance of accomplishment may become a determining factor when it comes to deciding who deserves to be promoted.
In conclusion, although many people are of the opinion that only staff with long years of service in a company deserves a promotion, I do not agree that is the only way to define would-be promoted. In my opinion, there is another crucial factor such as a personal contribution that helps a company to thrive and make a profit.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91578947368 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97984457383 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515789473684 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6888638915 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.882352941 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317128020107 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088763485332 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617224712003 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196248204775 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047996773753 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.