2.7.2022: Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time. Is this a positive or negative development?
With advanced technology, people are becoming more dependent most of their time on smart equipment, especially in their spare time. Although there is no doubt that technology can be beneficial to society to a certain extent, I assert that this will do more harm than benefit.
On the one hand, several reasons explain the popularity of using advanced equipment in pastimes. Firstly, the most significant of which is this kind of entertainment is widespread accessibility. They save more time by reducing travel time or money thanks to the help of electronic devices. For instance, instead of having a long line to go shopping, you only have a mouse click to order products. With the rapid change in society, people will be under more pressure, and they can find a laugh by playing video games or social media. As a result, using electronic devices helps them relieve stress or tired after hard- working days.
On the other hand, there are various reasons why I believe spending too much time using technology brings us more harm. The first reason is that social media, computer games, messaging, and dating websites can all be addictive. For example, games want you to play so that you will buy the next version, websites want you to interact so that they can bring in advertising money. Users end up wasting vast amounts of time and hemorrhaging money for low returns. In addition, the likelihood of weight and psychological diseases is very high, such as obesity or depression that humans seriously suffer from in this day and age. It is because of the lack of outdoor activities and also less communication face to face.
To sum up, besides the variety of advantages of using technology by making use of free time to relax, I still believe the disadvantages of electronic devices outweigh the advantages
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91503267974 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71804283367 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7412982 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.266666667 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16749715246 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502345155719 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063048455704 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114221966651 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069143680917 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.