It goes without saying that advertisement these days is gaining in popularity in such a way that gives rise to an inquiry of its impacts. While the upside is considerable, the downside of this trend is rather outweighing.
On the one hand, the advertising industry’s ever ubiquity has constructive roles in the development of the economy and society. As a matter of fact, the supreme purposes of advertisements are brand awareness and, then, consuming stimulation. By doing that, companies and manufacturers who promote their products would increase sale revenues and maximise their profit margins. These do not merely benefit the advertisers but also contribute to the socio-economic welfare through the tax system. Besides, the flourishing of this creative field offers an increasing number of related employments. Following by content creators or advertising campaign operators, advertising is expected to generate even new kinds of job in the future.
However, the disadvantages resulting from the proliferation of advertisement are worth questioning. Indeed, there emerges a concern about advertisement censorship policies, whereby inapt, implication content is displayed haphazardly. Aiming at children, advertisements may have adverse influences on their lifestyle, or even dire consequences are likely to arise as children exposed to violent and sexual content. Further implications are the perpetuating of consumerist society. The attribute at issue of advertising appears to be inciting people to buy goods impulsively, and bombarding consumers regularly would prompt them to spend money on unnecessary items. In the long term, consumerism can lead to resource squandering and exhausting.
In conclusion, although the ever popularity of advertisement bears several socioeconomic merits, it seems to be more of negative development. Strict censorship legislation needs to be imposed on advertising content, and people should pay close attention to financial decisions after being touted.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88775510204 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39576438518 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680272108844 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4253349057 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.1875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151989811298 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430158011381 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471944624671 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822412221633 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397368754205 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.