with all problems in the world today spending money on space exploration in a complete waste the money could be better spent on other causes.
It is considered that, along with all problems in the globe today, spending amount of money on space exploration is a totally waste and this money could be spent better on other issues. I totally disagree with the aforementioned statement.
To commence with, there are many reasons behind the situation. "Because" education related to space as well as planet also beneficial for those students who want to become astronauts. For these students, education of space must for their academices. To explain it, due to the fact that, space exploration also beneficial for academices, meteorological, planets, earth science as well as astrology. To epitome, ISRO Indian Space Research Organisation even helped to many universities, colleges as well as studies of scholars. As a result, youngster of day in a lot of knowledge related to planet as well as earth science.
Further, strengthening my viewpoint, space exploration immensely important for other sectors such as whether astronomy constellation, agricultural science. On other words, today India has the largest constellation of remote sensing satellites which provide services both at the national and global levels. For instance, Chandrayaan-2 is it designed to collect sample of lunar soil and conduct in situ studies of chemical mineralogical content present in lunar soil.
To recapitulate, I believe that although, for the space exploration huge amount of money spend however, it is a beneficial for educational institutions, science, planets, telecommunication, agricultural, astronomy as well as weather.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('totally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('waste') instead of another adjective.
...amount of money on space exploration is a totally waste and this money could be spent better on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entioned statement. To commence with, there are many reasons behind the situat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, then, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 237.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67932489451 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42818110888 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616033755274 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3436136892 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.166666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28192171797 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961835029292 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1617238927 0.0667982634062 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20553008377 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.197351337571 0.056905535591 347% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.