The best way for a government to prepare for the future is to invest in young people. To what extent you agree or disagree ?
The matter of efficacious governmental preparation for the future has long been a topic of considerable debate. It has been commonly held that directing resources towards youth investments is the most effective approach to regarding for forth coming times. This essay will examine both sides of the arguments before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of government to prepare for the future is to invest in young people. First, government subsidies for people’s education are believed to equalize educational opportunities among young adolescent regardless of their background. This invest support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall education college rate of lower-income people but also so mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, prepare for the future is to invest in young people would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once government just invest in young people. First, prepare for the future is to invest in young people would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from school tuition and fees because government decrease the tuition for prepare invest young people, schools could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as the healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, government just invest in young people would tempt many young people including those who are not academically or show no intestinal in college pursuits, thereby adding great burdens for schools admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more study paths. It, instead, would be a more invest viable option if the resources on supporting less privileged yet gifted students.
In conclusion, despite the important role of young people and next generation. Just focus on support young people have many drawbacks. It is, thus, hoped that netizens, especially government, should consider using it sensibly while maintaining develop country and balance other areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62834224599 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89328164368 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598930481283 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1040684234 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5625 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373180074185 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130781909899 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103209576472 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210374670714 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911798243896 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.