One of most conspicuous trends of today's world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that better method to save environment is by using local resources such as food, buildings materials instead of buying artificial sources from other place. In my opinion, this apprehension sounds me more ration. I will discuss number of views in following paragraphs.
To commence with, there are deluges of arguments in favor of this stance. The most preponderant one is to reduce pollution. To elaborate it, when products import from other nation with the help of large transport system such as cargo ships and planes by paying large amount funds, they product carbon emission which effect the environment badly. In contrast, using product from local area they will not any type of pollution caused. It can not only contribute to protect atmosphere, but all lead to numerous other benefits in various fields such as decline in prices. Thanks to the wide range of advantages local product offers, masses can enhance the productivity and quality of their lives much ease and efficacy. Needless to say, all these merits stand in one good stead, as far as augmenting their chance of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of aforementioned preposition is that it is only likely to help one excel and thrive by deceasing use of plastic and chemical. This is because, to transport food from one nation another country then need to protect from spoiling for this they use chemical substance and plastic which is have negative impact on both human body and environment. As they product harmful gasses those are awful for society while there is no need to save food by using any type of substance which person buy from local market. For instance, a study result published by the government of Australia March 2014 and April 2016, clearly indicates that India distribute large amount of food to various nation which are protect by the use of chemical or plastic. Hence, it is clear that why many in favor of this viewpoint.
On the other hand a section of society contradict above said view by providing some justification. The primary factor is that some nation have not product of natural resource from different reason, so, in that case they have to export product from other nation those have huge quantity of sources in available for example, South Korea have not much product of their own food due to lack of area and any suitable environment, so to fulfill their needs they have to buy food from India or some other nation. Therefore, some are not agreed with above said viewpoint.
To conclude, having pondered over above said it is crystal clear that to save environment not importing natural resources from other nation is indeed too great to ignore.
- The diagrams below show the design for a wind turbine and its location Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the man features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the best way to protect the environment is used in local resources like food and building materials rather than transporting resources from other places to extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your own opinion
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...chemical substance and plastic which is have negative impact on both human body and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'protected'.
Suggestion: protected
...unt of food to various nation which are protect by the use of chemical or plastic. Henc...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 41.998997996 193% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 470.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95319148936 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56742486533 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517021276596 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.2178074967 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.526315789 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7368421053 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22556289513 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601858526791 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640378501475 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13374043749 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382096184502 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.