Rapidly increasing amount of pollution and greenhouse effects are serious and linger threats to our civilisation. However, I agree that raising the cost of fuel might help to reduce environmental issues, I definitely do not think that is the best solution.
On the one hand, increasing price of fuel might shrink number of cars and planes. Many people use car as a way how to commute, therefore, low-cost airlines made traveling way cheaper and affordable for more people. With affordable tickets and relatively low price of petrol, people use these ways of transport more often than decades ago. As a result of increasing prices of fuel, many people will commute by public transport and number of flights will reduce.
However, exhausted fumes are not the only one factor of global warming. The members of society, over last decade, learned how to recycle the most common articles such as glass, plastic and paper. Majority of cities have supplied each household with colour separated street bins, clearly labeled with instructions. Hence, vast amount of factories have developed new procedures to re-use such articles and transform them into new products.
Secondly, despite the fact that the members of public are aware of necessity to recycle major articles, future education of environmental behaviour is essential. People should be educated of significant dip of drinking water. Take South Africa for example. Cape Town in last two years facing serious lack of drinking water, therefore, local authorities not only limited water use, but also educate locals and visitors about serious consequences if they do not follow the rules. Furthermore, people should be convinced to re-use plastics, like single used bags, take-away food containers, straws. These products are mostly un-recyclable and as the way of disposal, throw into the ocean. Until people start re-use these products, or better, using environmentally friendly products, will not only plastic trash be dispose into the ocean, killing an innocent sea creatures.
In short, there are a numbers of factors how to resolve the international environmental problems, but increasing petrol price is only the one of them. In fact, I would argue that recycling and education the members of public is the more important.
- Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter? 73
- It is generally discussed among the public that extreme sports such as sky diving and rock climbing should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The chart illustrates housing preferences among people who lived in the British cities of London Oxford and Cambridge in the year 2005 87
- The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 860, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'creature'?
Suggestion: creature
...into the ocean, killing an innocent sea creatures. In short, there are a numbers of fa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in fact, in short, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32596685083 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75282861483 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60773480663 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.332086414 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.473684211 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78947368421 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15484408581 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456778880036 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645057167888 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100245870115 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755471508906 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.