Business organisations should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree?
Businesses have many responsibilities to meet. Among those, there are different perspectives about providing the life-long employment contracts to employees. However, I believe that, the feeling of security is the key to the quality of work achievement.
Businesses have a responsibility to provide feeling of security for their employees by providing a permanent employment contract. The feeling of security can result in the quality of work and that can be beneficial for the company’s point of view. If they feel anxious about losing their jobs, the quality of work would not meet the company’s standard as compared to the quality of work achieved by employees who had that secure feelings.
Also, there are several benefits of persistent hiring employees for a long time. The time can be considered as the first and foremost benefits. Since employees have been trained and used to the environments of businesses, it establishes the faster and quality of task achievements. For example, when the employees have worked in a company for 15 years, they can easily achieve the tasks as it became a natural cycle for them in comparison to new employees.
A company can save costs. Conducting trainings for new employees, doing interviews and taking HR manager’s time to participate in all those meetings and trainings can be considered as waste of their time and money. Instead of spending their times on those meetings and trainings, the time can be used on the result-driven tasks. For example, HR managers spent about 1.5 hours per day seeking for new employees and this time can be saved by replacing their time to do existed employee’s relationship, it will benefit the company for the long run.
In conclusion, life-long contracts to employees can be considered as providing the security of employee which leads to the quality of work and its achievement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20394736842 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13569499513 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493421052632 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3515632621 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.466666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175415179243 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684614943954 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613575088763 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100646158601 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449913873735 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.